- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBgSJ7bsP2U
- https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/22-new-languages-and-variants-6-new-regions-for-amazon-translate/
- https://www.inoreader.com/article/3a9c6e7b4fabaa5f-amazon-transcribe-video-snacks-using-custom-vocabulary-amazon-web-services
In my life I have seen many programming courses that were essentially like the usual kind of driving lessons, in which one is taught how to handle a car instead of how to use a car to reach one’s destination. My point is that a program is never a goal in itself; the purpose of a program is to evoke computations and the purpose of the computations is to establish a desired effect. Although the program is the final product made by the programmer, the possible computations evoked by it – the “making” of which is left to the machine! – are the true subject matter of his trade. For instance, whenever a programmer states that his program is correct, he really makes an assertion about the computations it may evoke.
Let’s translate it to a few languages: how about Albanian, Hausa, Pashto and Tagalog?
A rayuwata na ga kwasa-kwasai da dama da suka kasance da gaske kamar irin darussan tuki da aka saba da su, inda ake koya wa mutum yadda zai rike mota maimakon yadda zai yi amfani da mota don kaiwa mutum makoma. Dalilina shi ne, shirin ba shi da wata manufa a kanta; manufar shirin shi ne tayar da komfuta kuma manufar ƙididdigar ita ce kafa tasirin da ake so. Ko da yake shirin shine samfurin karshe da mai shiryawa ya yi, ƙididdigar da za a iya amfani da ita - “yin” wanda aka bar shi zuwa na'ura! - su ne batun gaskiya game da cinikinsa. Alal misali, duk lokacin da mai shiryawa ya ce shirinsa daidai ne, yana yin tabbaci game da ƙididdigar da zai iya fitarwa.